Oscar Wilde's Preface to The Picture of Dorian Gray has often been treated as a manifesto, a series of slogans wrapped in the glittering foil of epigram. Yet to take these aphorisms at face value would be to miss the point entirely. Wilde’s artistry lies not in offering doctrines to be swallowed whole, but in creating a space where sincerity and irony collapse into one another like facing mirrors. If Wilde appears to say everything and nothing, to declare a credo while slyly mocking the very possibility of having one, it is because the true genius of a good epigram is not its definitiveness, but its disorienting multiplicity.
The Preface is built of oppositions — art and morality, artist and critic, surface and soul — yet it refuses to resolve them. “There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book,” Wilde writes. “Books are well written, or badly written. That is all.” It is a daring pronouncement, glibly final, ringing with the authority of a closing gavel. But behind its apparent boldness looms a sly grin. That is all — but of course it isn’t. In the very act of disavowing morality, Wilde implicitly acknowledges the moral reception that literature inevitably provokes. His declaration tries to kill the question by naming it, like a magician revealing the secret of the trick while still performing it.
Wilde’s relationship to morality is thus one of ironic intimacy. He denies art's ethical stakes even as he courts them, a maneuver characteristic of the Decadent movement’s more agile thinkers. As Arthur Symons observed in his 1893 Symbolist Movement in Literature, the true Decadent "dreads nothing so much as the inevitable conclusion," preferring the "subtle possibilities of meaning." Wilde, with his gift for "subtle possibilities," loads his Preface with statements that oscillate between earnestness and parody. His aim is not to foreclose interpretation but to provoke it, an aesthetic ethos not unlike that of Stéphane Mallarmé, who, writing around the same time, insisted that "to name an object is to suppress three-quarters of the enjoyment...to suggest, therein lies the dream."
Consider Wilde’s claim: “The artist is the creator of beautiful things.” On one hand, it reads as a plain assertion of aestheticism. On the other, it is curiously narrow. If beauty alone is the domain of the artist, what becomes of tragedy, the grotesque, the sublime? Wilde restricts art only to simultaneously imply that art cannot be restricted. Beauty, too, may be monstrous. Indeed, Dorian Gray is nothing if not a meditation on beauty corrupted, beauty turned against itself — the painted visage remaining pristine while the soul beneath curdles into horror.
Moreover, Wilde’s definition of the artist is absurdly utopian: “To reveal art and conceal the artist is art’s aim.” Here again, the irony is thick. Art, as the very activity of human self-expression, cannot so easily efface the self. As Friedrich Nietzsche acidly noted in The Birth of Tragedy, all art is “the highest task and the truly metaphysical activity of this life,” a dance of personal ecstasy masked in form. Wilde’s insistence on the artist’s concealment thus functions less as a practical prescription than as a glittering impossibility — a paradox whose impossibility is the point.
Indeed, Wilde’s Preface operates less like a philosophical treatise and more like a kaleidoscope: tilt it one way and it dazzles with sincerity; tilt it another and it shatters into playful absurdity. Even his apparent condemnations are suspect. “Those who find ugly meanings in beautiful things are corrupt without being charming.” Surely, Wilde himself, with his attraction to the perverse and decadent, found “ugly meanings” no less fascinating than beautiful ones. The line reads less like a law of taste than a mischievous finger pointed at the critics Wilde knew would soon assail him.
That Wilde anticipated moralistic outrage is evident from his subsequent defensive posture during the trials that ruined him. It is tempting to read the Preface, published in 1891, as a preemptive shield against Victorian piety. Yet even here, Wilde’s irony cuts in two directions. On the one hand, he disdains the moralist’s interpretation. On the other, he acknowledges that scandal — and the public's hunger for it — is inseparable from art’s fate. The Preface, like the novel, both demands and derides its own reception.
The Preface's crowning ambiguity lies in its closing salvo: “All art is quite useless.” Taken at face value, it is a slap in the face of utilitarianism. It inverts the Victorian ethos of “improvement” and “moral edification” like a mirror turning sun into shadow. But the line’s irony is double-edged. Declaring art useless is itself a use — a liberation from the chains of didacticism, a rebellion against the notion that art must serve anything outside itself. Wilde transforms uselessness into the highest value, the very definition of spiritual freedom. As Kant wrote in the Critique of Judgment, aesthetic experience is characterized by “purposiveness without purpose.” Wilde’s final aphorism, cloaked in flippancy, thus reveals itself as the most serious claim of all.
Yet, to take even this seriously is to risk missing Wilde’s final joke: the serious and the unserious are never pure in Wilde’s world. Each disguises the other. As Kierkegaard noted in Either/Or, irony is “an infinite absolute negativity,” destroying certainty not by outright contradiction but by perpetual, mischievous instability. Wilde’s Preface dances precisely in this Kierkegaardian space: it seduces us with apparent certainties only to dissolve them into a wry smile.
This method — the deployment of the epigram not as a fixed truth but as an instrument of destabilization — is Wilde’s true genius. In this, he resembles the Sophists of ancient Greece more than the plodding moralists of his own age. Like Gorgias, who declared that “nothing exists,” and if it did, it could not be known or communicated, Wilde’s brilliance lies not in proposing systems but in artfully revealing the cracks in every system. His epigrams are not stepping-stones toward dogma; they are sinkholes opening beneath our feet.
In this light, Wilde’s Preface does not "say" something in the traditional sense. It performs something: the failure of aphorism to contain the multiplicity of life. Every neat antithesis Wilde proposes — beauty versus ugliness, artist versus critic, surface versus depth — collapses under the weight of its own theatricality. Wilde does not offer us a house of philosophy to inhabit; he gives us a house of mirrors in which to lose ourselves.
This performative aspect becomes even more evident when we consider the context of Wilde’s broader oeuvre. In The Critic as Artist, Wilde argues that “the highest Criticism…is more creative than creation.” Here, criticism (traditionally the servant of creation) becomes superior, more imaginative, less constrained. The artist, far from being a pure creator, is revealed as a kind of critic of reality. Thus, when Wilde declares in the Preface that "all art is at once surface and symbol," he gestures toward this collapse: art, like life, is endlessly interpretable — and therefore endlessly elusive.
The ironies of the Preface mirror the ironies of Dorian Gray itself. Dorian, in seeking to preserve surface beauty, destroys the interior life. Yet the painting — the symbol — reveals what the surface hides. In this way, Wilde shows us that surfaces are not innocent: they are charged with latent meanings. To treat the Preface as a simple endorsement of aestheticism, or a simple rejection of morality, would thus be as foolish as treating Dorian’s portrait as a mere ornament.
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche warns against the "idiosyncrasy of moralistic interpretations" and praises those rare spirits who can dwell among masks without forgetting that they are masks. Wilde’s Preface demands such readers: those willing to entertain contradictions without rushing to resolution, to savor surfaces without denying their depths.
Thus, to ask whether Wilde is "serious" or "ironic" is to pose the wrong question. He is both, always, inextricably. The genius of the Preface lies in its ability to suspend us within this tension, where thought sharpens itself against thought like blades in the dark. It is not a roadmap but a labyrinth. Its apparent clarity conceals deliberate obfuscation; its aphoristic brilliance mocks the very idea of final wisdom.
In the end, Wilde’s Preface teaches by unteaching. It trains the reader not in what to think, but in how to think — or rather, how to unthink, how to let go of the desire for stable conclusions. Like a Zen koan, it points toward an experience beyond rational grasp, a shimmering region where beauty, irony, sincerity, and mockery intermingle.
If "all art is quite useless," then the Preface is its own best proof: dazzling, maddening, useless — and utterly indispensable.
No comments:
Post a Comment