There exists in literature a certain genus of man whose villainy is not forged upon the battlefield nor declared with fanfare, but rather enacted within the crevices of language itself — a treachery of whispers, of sycophantic bows, of voices oiled and lacquered to the precise degree of subservience that masks their corroding aims. Among such creatures, Uriah Heep of Charles Dickens' David Copperfield and Gríma Wormtongue of Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings emerge as twin specters: two pale, obsequious shadows who inhabit the margins of greater narratives, murmuring decay into the ears of better men, each slouching toward their inevitable exposure with the inevitability of rot beneath a floorboard. Yet, as literary types, they are not merely duplicative; it is in the contrast between them that we come to understand the full taxonomy of parasitic evil—the Victorian and the mythic, the solicitor's apprentice and the wraith at the king's side, each lubricating power through the art of abasement.
Consider Heep first, the "umble" man, his very speech dipped in the viscous treacle of self-effacement. His villainy operates not by brute force but by insinuation — a slow seep of influence achieved through the relentless performance of servility. He is the shadow cast by a society obsessed with class and upward mobility, a creature who learns to weaponize humility itself. His every utterance, from his first introduction, is a rehearsed curtsy of the soul: “I am well aware that I am the umblest person going... My mother is likewise a very umble person. We live in a numble abode.” Dickens, who had no particular love for lawyers and less for those who ape virtue in the pursuit of gain, gives us in Heep an anatomy of the social climber corrupted by his own self-loathing, a figure who ascends precisely by reminding others of the lowliness from which he rises.
There is in Heep's villainy a peculiarly bureaucratic horror. He is the evil of ink-stained fingers, of ledgers manipulated in candlelight, of property signed away under the legal aegis of good order. Heep understands that, in Victorian England, destruction is most efficiently administered through the silent recalibration of documents, not swords. He is the demon of the office, the infernal clerk whose power emerges precisely from his invisibility within systems designed to obscure malice beneath procedure. Like Kafka’s minor officials, Heep thrives in the interstices of paperwork, his malevolence amplified by the cold machinery of law, his crimes executed in duplicate and triplicate.
How different—and yet not entirely dissimilar — is Gríma Wormtongue, that pallid fixture at the side of Théoden King, whose influence flows not through ledgers but through breath. If Heep is the embodiment of the Victorian office, Wormtongue is its medieval analogue: the courtly advisor whose proximity to power allows him to bleed it dry. His name is not subtle — Gríma, "mask" or "specter," and Wormtongue, which suggests both serpent and rot. Heep's "umble" is replaced here by poison administered via language: the slow, sibilant undermining of courage, the carefully planted suggestion of despair, the architecture of submission constructed word by word in the king's failing ear.
But where Heep seeks advancement, Wormtongue seems to lust after decay itself. He is less interested in inheriting power than in hollowing it out from within. His is the nihilism of the parasitic intellect that would prefer the corpse of the kingdom to the flourishing of a realm in which he has no rightful place. If Heep’s evil is transactional—a lunge upward in the social order — Gríma’s is apocalyptic. He serves Saruman not for personal gain but because he has committed himself to the machinery of entropy, to the unraveling of all that is hale and good and green.
What unites them, however, is their shared understanding that the most enduring victories are secured through the corruption of language. Both are rhetoricians of ruination. Heep binds his victims in the sticky web of feigned humility, his every phrase a rope knotted around their ankles. Wormtongue administers words as anaesthetic, dulling Théoden’s will until the very memory of strength seems a quaint abstraction. And both are, in the end, undone by the sudden reassertion of clarity: Heep by David Copperfield's unmasking, Wormtongue by Gandalf's arrival and the cleansing of Théoden’s mind. It is a notable feature of both narratives that speech, which had been the medium of the villain's power, becomes the instrument of their defeat. Exposure is a kind of exorcism, and truth-telling the final antidote to the poison of their insinuations.
Yet there lingers an ambiguity about these figures that resists complete moralization. Heep, after all, is as much a victim of his station as he is an architect of his own downfall. Dickens is careful to suggest that the society which spawns Uriah Heeps will never lack for them; his grotesquery is not congenital but cultivated, a mirror held up to a culture that thrives on the abasement of the lower orders while sneering at their attempts to rise. Wormtongue, too, is less a sovereign agent of evil than a creature bent under the yoke of greater powers. Saruman’s spell lies heavy on him. He does not destroy Rohan alone; he is merely the intermediary of its undoing.
And perhaps that is the deeper horror these figures suggest: not merely that there exist men like Heep and Wormtongue who would see good things reduced to ash, but that they are always accompanied by a larger structure that rewards such behavior. Heep's legal machinations are only possible within a system that prizes paper over principle. Wormtongue’s venomous counsel finds purchase only because a kingdom had already grown complacent enough to let him speak unchecked. They are symptoms, not plagues; the shadow cast is always proportional to the light permitted to wane.
In the end, we are left not merely with two cautionary portraits of sycophantic evil but with a meditation on the fragility of fortresses — be they legal, political, or personal — against the slow, whispering corrosion of the trusted insider. The smile that bows too low, the tongue that flatters too well, the hand that fawns as it filches: these are the avatars of a quieter doom, the ones that, when history does not notice, manage to undo us entirely.
No comments:
Post a Comment